After reading "A tale of two cities"
"A tale of two cities" is one of Dickenss most important representative works.The novel profoundly exposed the society contradiction before the French Revolution,intensely attacks the aristocratic social class is dissolute and cruel,and sincerely sympathizes with the depressed classes.The novel also described many magnificent scenes like the revolt people attacked Bastille and so on,which displayed peoples great strength. The novel has portrayed many different people. Doctor Manette is honest and kind but suffers the persecution actually , Lucie is beautiful and gentle ,Charles is graceful and noble,Lorry is upright and honest ,Sydney is semblance of indifferent, innermost feelings of warm,unconventional but also selfless and lofty,Miss Pross is straightforward and loyal,Evremonde brothers are cruel and sinister......The plex hatred is hard to solve, the cruel revenge has made more hatreds, loves rebirth in the hell edge,but take the life as the price. As an outstanding w
riter,in Dickenss work,the language skill is essential.Each kind of rhetoric technique,like the ***ogy,the exaggeration,the contrast,the humorous,and the taunt are handled skillfully,and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak."A tale of two cities" has its difference with the general historical novel, its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes.With the broad real background of the French Revolution,the author take the fictional character Doctor Manettes experience as the main clue,interweaves the unjust charge, love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together,the plot is criss-crossed,and the clue is plex.The author use narrates,foreshadowing,upholstery and so many techniques,causes the structure integrity and strictness,the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature,it displayed the remarkable artistic skill.the style "A tale of two cities" is solemnity and melancholy,fills indignantion,but lacks the
humor of the early works.
The tale of two cities is a historical story, one of Dickens’ long fictions.The background to the novel is the revolution of France .It portrayed a brutal and bloody story , but it also contained love and friendship.
In the novel, Dickens sarcastically described a typical cruel nobleman-marquis of Evermonde . When he was young he and his brother stole a countrywoman by force and killed her family .What’s worse , he used his power to imprison Dr Manette , a kind and honest man who knew all the things they had done and wanted to disclose their crimes . In order to hide their crimes. Marquis of Evermonde and his brother threw Doctor Manette into prison for 18 years . During these 18 years,Doctor Manette lost his freedom and suffer a great in spirit .
I felt unthinkable that Marquis of Evermonde and his brother killed people just as easily as they killed chickens. They deprived other people’s freedom as they liked and they thought it was normal and unremarkable. They had never realized that they had done something wrong or something improper. Because their nature was cruel and evil, like demons. There is an old saying which means: People who mit too many crimes will kill themselves. After all, there is justice in the world. The demons can’t be rampant forever. Because the world will not forgive them. They will pay their lives for their crimes. Let’s see the consequence of the Marquis,’’He lay there like a stone with a knife pushed into his heart." I think it was just what he ought to gain and it is a real exciting scene.
The Marquis’ death was just the beginning of people’s resistance to the nobleman. Gradually more and more people joined in the revolution. One after another nobleman were sentenced to death and their heads were cut down . However, some innocent people were implicated in the revolution. Charles Darney was one of them He was the nephew of Marquis of Evermonde. To the opposite of his uncle, Darney was a kind and independent young man.
Dickens spoke highly of kindness mercy and love in the novel too. This is the other thone of the novel when Doctor Manette was released from prison. It was his daughter Lucie who took care of him and helped him return to normal. During this time, Dr manette and Lucie knew Charles Darney and Sydeny Carton, the two young man fell in love with Lucie at the same time . At last, Lucie married Chares Darney .Dr Manette accepted Darney as his son-in-law although he knew that Darney was the nephew of the man who threw him into prison for18 years. This is the love between father and daughter. And Sydeny Carton , the very great man ,loved Lucie dee*. He promised Lucie that he would do everything for her happiness. He did it truely ,he sacrificed himself instead of Darney who looked the same as him. This is love for lovers . This is the most wonderful thing in the world. It also reminds us that no matter how no matter when there is true love existing. At the end , Lucie, Dr Manette and Darney arrived in England safely.
The tale of two cities is different from other historical fictions. Its characters and main plots are fictional under the real background of the revolution of France. The author made the experience of the fictional charactor Dr Manette as the main clue.The plots are plicated, and they are flexuous and dramatic. The structure is plete and rigorous.
Dickens had dear love and hate. He praised those who ought to be praised and attacked those who ought to be attacked. The motivation of the novel maybe just warn the English dominators. But I think we can learn something meaningful from the tale of two cities.
A Tale of Two Cities was written by Charles Dickens, who was born in Portsmouth, England in 1812. As the second of eight children, Dickens had to go to work at the age of twelve to support his poor family, and he lived a difficult childhood. This troublesome time scarred him dee* and provided him with substantial material for such stories as Oliver Twist, David Copperfield, and Great Expectations. Though just accepted only little education, Dickens became a famous writer through his struggling self-learning and extremely hard work, and he was the representative writer of realism in the 19th century.
Charles Dickens lived in the period of transition between feudalism and capitalism, when the industrial revolution originated in England swept through Europe. As large numbers of workers invaded into urban centers to earn a living, the bourgeois took advantages of the surplus of labor by keeping wages low. The poor thus remained poor, and often lived in a narrow and filthy environment. Dickens’ writing depicted various directions about this society, and provided a keen, sympathetic chronicle of the plight of the urban poor.
A Tale of Two Cities mainly about the great atrocities of French aristocrats compelled the poor citizens to resist violently. Doctor Manette spent eighteen years as a prisoner in Bastille because he intended to expose the atrocity after learning that
Marquis Evrémonde killed a beautiful farmwife and her younger brother because of his brother’s lust. After Doctor Manette was free again, his daughter Lucie got married with Charles Darnay, Marquis Evrémonde’s nephew, but chose to live in England because he could not accept the cruel injustices of the French social system and the snobbish and cruel values of his uncle. However, Marquis Evrémonde continued his atrocities. After his crazy carriage crushed over a farmer’s little baby as if nothing happen, he was killed at night. A revolutionary storm was brewing. Mr. and Mrs.Defarge were the revolutionaries in the poor Saint Antoine section of Paris. They wanted to kill all French aristocrats, including Charles Darnay. Mr.Defarge used to be Doctor Manette’s servant, so he was kind to Manettes, while his wife’s heart burned with longing for revenge. At last, Charles Darnay was judged to death, But Sydney Carton, a lawyer who loved Lucie dee*, willing to die instead of Darnay, as they had similar appearance.
From my personal point of view, the person A Tale of Two Cities described astounded me very much. Some of them were cruel, crazy and reasonless, while some of them were kind, moral and had own mind.
Sydney Carton was the person I thought the most. He was a smart attorney, without his help, Mr. Stryver could not solve any cases. But he was lazy, alcoholic, and cared nothing and nobody, he even could not find any interests in his own life, it seems that he lived just for wasting life. But he loved Lucie dee*. Finally, he became a hero, because he sacrificed his life to save Darnay. I didn’t know why the author spent so many words to form such a strange guy at frist, he used his life to love Lucie, after all. But now, I caught it. Perhaps the terrible Carton symbolized the terrible old France, and his change in the end shown that everything could change, including the old France, a new and fine society would replace the violence.
Then, Charles Darnay. He was worthy of esteem or respect. He displayed great virtue in his rejection of his uncle, Marquis Evrémonde. Money and power meant nothing to him, if they came from exploitation and oppression. Even though he had to inherit his uncle’s bequest, he left them to the poor and lived in London throught his own effort. When he realized that he must go back to Paris to help Gabelle, one of his servants, and make right the wrong his uncle had done, he acted without hesitation because he knew that was his duty. He even refused Carton’s help after he was judged to death. I thought, Charles Darnay was a shiny diamond in that cruel and violent society, and he was a hope, the hope of equality and peace.
Third, Mrs.Defarge. How crazy this woman was. Nobody could stop her steps toward revenge, except the death. Although it said that wherever there is oppression, there is resistance, I didn’t agree with Mrs.Defarge totally. Her resistance was inhumane, insensible and endless. For just as the aristocracy’s oppression had made an oppressor Mrs.Defarge herself, so will her oppression, in turn, make oppressors her victims. In the end of the novel, her death by a bullet from her own gun. It shown the author’s belief that inordinate retaliated lust would destroy one own self.
On the whole, A Tale of Two Cities is a successful novel. It shows us oppression and resistance, violence and terror, revolution and vengeance, love and friendship.
I am lucky enough to live in the 21st century, when peace and development are pursued all along. Nowadays, there also are many problems and dissensions among this world, but violence does not the best way problems are solved. Violence just creates more problems, something every sensible person knows. What we need are talks and communication. The time A Tale of Two Cities mentions has gone, we should do enough preparation to adapt the coming age.
Recently, I read a tale of two cities. I think that it’s a good novel.
First, I want to introduce the author of this book .His name is Charles Dickens, he is an outstanding writer. He is one of the greatest writers in the 19 century. However, he had a painful childhood. He was arrested when he was 10 years old due to household debt. He had only a few years of learning. So, in his early years, his works are more about the painful children. He criticized the black of capitalism and had the sympathy for the poor. Now, let me introduce this novel. The background of this book is the French revolution. Before the revolution, the young doctor .Manette witnessed the guilty of the French marquis. So he was arrested in the Bastille by the marquis. After two years, his wife died. His daughter Lucie was send to London by his friends Lorry and adopted by the Miss Pross who is a maidservant. After 18 years, he was released from the Bastille and was taken care by his old servant Defarge. His daughter wanted to take his father to London. In the travel, she met the son of the marquis Charles Darnay who hated the guilty of his father and uncle. Then they loved each other. And now, Charles Dannay’s father had died, so manette wanted to forget the painful memory and hoped his daughter happy. So he agreed with them. In 1789, France break the revolution. All of the marquises was send to the guillotine. Because the Darnay was a marquis. So the Defarge read the report which was written by the doctor. Then Dannay was sentenced to death. Now Carton who always hidden loved Lucie went to the prison and he pretended Dannay. So Dannay escaped the prison. And carton was killed. However Madame Defarge still not gave up. She wanted to killed Dannay’s wife Lucie and their young child; finally she was burned by the pross.
After read this novel, let me know about the French revolution. I think the people who lived in that period were not lucky. The poor were very sad. They were too blindness. And I was moved the carton, he died for his love, and I like him very much.
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incre*ty, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way
Charles Dickens(1812～1870)，one of the greatest novelist in England. I have read his A tale of two cities .And this is the beginning of the book.
“A Tale of Two Cities”, one of Dickens’ works, is a well-known long story. And it has a great influence on the society at that time. When I saw the title at first, I thought it might tell something about the developing process of two cities, which might be no fun. However, after reading it , I found I had been wrong.
It portrays a brutal, bloody and revengeful society as well as love and friendship. It happened before and after the Revolution in France. The ruthless and cruel landowners and noblemen exploited the miserable people who owned nothing, but these poor people worked for others day and night. Noblemen had the power that one word would doubtlessly send others to prison. As time passed by, the noise of the coming-up revolution storm in Paris was growing louder and louder. At last, it was on the fourteenth of July, 1789 that the revolution broke out.
“The Bastille and its officers were in the hands of people, and the people wanted revenge and blood.” The true Freedom of France came. “The Guillotine, the new machine of death, cut off the heads of many, many people—not only the powerful and the cruel, but also the beautiful, the innocent, and the good.” Among the good, there was a man called Darney. Even though his father, wife and friends knew he was innocent, the people thought he was the enemy and would go to the Guillotine.
In spite of a shadow of fear and hate here and there, we can also see the great and kind persons. I think the greatest person is Mr. Manette who had been a prisoner in the Bastille for eighteen years. What he suffered was difficult to imagine, but he was still kind and loved his daughter. He did his best to save his son-in-law, whose father and uncle were the men that had ever sent him to prison. Another great man is the lawyer, Sydney Carton, a friend of Darney. Before Darney went to Guillotine, Mr. Carton changed places with him and he said, “It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever know.” Besides, the story is full of love, including the love between father and daughter, the love between husband and wife, the love among friends and so on. In short, only if you have love in your heart, the life is meaningful. At the same time, the revenge will run away with you, freedom and happiness will be around you.
There is no doubt that Charles Dickens is one of the greatest writers
in English. From this book, I see some true lives and moving stories from the old ages. I think you must feel the same as me that we don’t want to live in that condition. To be frank, we all look forward to living in a peaceful and love situation. Though the present life has improved a lot, there are still wars in some places. All that we need is to solve the problems in peaceful ways instead of by force. So let’s work hard together in order to make our life much more meaningful and happier, make our society more harmonious.
——双城记英文读后感6篇
Crazily,but truthfully,I finished reading the most part of the novel "A Tale of Two Cities" in just one day.Lost in the story,I felt like being together with the characters and experiencing the same exciting events.Soon it came to an end.To tell you my feelings,its infinite sadneand a strong emotion that can drive me to cry.
The story is set in London and Paris at the time of the great French Revolution.It shows the causes of revolution and its effects on peoples day-to-day lives.Before the revolution,the King and the aristocracy treated their people cruelly in France.The common people were extremely poor and miserable.The crops in the fields were poor as if even the land shared the misery of the people.And there were so heavy taxes that all the villagers had nothing to hand over at last.On the other hand,the aristocracy made their will as the law by using money and gold.There were no justice,no equality and no fairness.Just as what happened to Dr Manette,he wrote to the Minister to show the crime what Marquis Evremonde had done,resulting in himself being arrested and sent to the prison Bastille without any reason.
Then this situation of darknewas needed to be changed.As people such as the Defarges prepared and arranged,at length the Revolution came to break out.When the Bastille was captured and the King was tried and put to death as well as many other aristocrats,things didnt go on as what they had been expected.The sistuation stayed the same,or even worse.The prisoners from the Bastille were set free while more prisons were filled with people who had done no wrong again.People who once lived on the bottom of clatook the charge now and their heart had been full of evil.The only thing they wanted to do was to revenge.And these so-called "patriots" would like to see more and more innocent prisoners going to the guillotine and thats their joy.As the novel wrote,"In everything they did were merciless,for they had been hardened in the fires of suffering and the touch of pity could make no mark on them".
Equality and fairneis what people seek,which led to the French Revolution.As a consequence,neither equality nor fairnewas got after the revolution.And thats the tragedy of the history.I was heavyhearted when reading what Sydney Carton said before death and I burst into tears finally.
A Tale of Two Cities is one of Dickens’s masterpieces; the story is an exposure of the contradiction before France Revolution-the appealing of “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” by France lower class.
The main clue of the novel is based on the terrible experience of Dr. Manette, the plot is very complex, attracting, and exciting. Lying at the heart of which we can see the themes from different people.
Sydney Carton
When I read the chapter pertaining to interrogation on Charles Darney, intuition tells that the lawyer assistant who feels at ease with his eyes fixed on the ceiling must be a very special man, which turned out to be right when I finished the whole book. He seems indifferent about everything, even his love. He is brilliant but he thinks otherwise, or rather, he thinks he is inferior to others. Even his master thinks that if he worried about this or that, he would make a great success. Feeling of humbleness is the fatal point leading the loss of his beloved one. If Lucie Manette lives with him, he thinks, she would sustain much hardship. At the end of the story, he sacrifices his life for his love willingly.
Many people say that love is selfish and egocentric, but the temperament of Sydney Carton tells us that love can be sublime and pure. Through this, Dickens tells us loving someone doesn’t mean you should live together with him or her. You can help your beloved one silently, even sacrifice for love. This is universal fraternity, I think, which is the sublimation of normal love. And also, Dickens may indicate that true love really exists, regardless of the situation is full of commotion or not.
Charles Darney
He’s born at a family of royal lineage-the son of Marquis. Regret and abomination fill in his mind for the cruelty and the crime his family have done to the poor. He determines to quit the right of inheritance of his family and moves to England to acting as a French teacher. When he comes back to France, his notorious and sadistic uncle who holds the succession of the family doesn’t welcome him. His uncle is doomed to death because of his cruelty. When he returns to England, he proposes marriage to Lucie Manette. He knows his proposal may not be accepted by Dr.Manette, for he is the son of the enemy of Dr.Manette. After the France Revolution breaks out, he returns to France again to save a servant. But unfortunately, he’s cast into prison.
Lucie Manette
She goes to France with Jarvis Lorry to take her father back, she shows great sympathy to Sydney Carton, and she prayed his husband would get an early deliverance from captivity.
She is a kind-hearted lady made of love and sympathy; she is also the incarnation of elegance.
Dr.Manette
As a victim of the gloom society, he lives a miserable and contradictory life. After releasing from prison, the only thing he does is making shoes, which become worse when he comes across a harsh situation. He loves his daughter just as she does to him, even when he knows that Charles Darney is the son of his enemy, he allow the proposal. And when he notices his daughter was totally down to know the fact that her husband was put into prison, he promise to her that he will rescue him out. He spares no effects to do that, in vain, though.
From this person, Dickens may tells that love between the lower-class family members are as pure as crystal.
Jarvis Lorry
An elderly manager at Tellsons Bank and a dear friend of Dr. Manette. He is very loyal to Dr. Manette. He accompanies them all the time without considering his own life.
Couple Defarge
They’re the leader of the revolution. Ernest Defarge, to some extent, is a good man. He was the servant of Dr.Manette, he provides accommodation for him. But his wife, Madame Defarge, is really a wicked woman. She knits all the time, she wants to kill all the people who lead a richer or happier life just out of envying and revenge. The result turns out to be dramatic: she’s killed by herself as a consequence that the gun goes off by accident.
Resurrection maybe is the main theme in the novel. Dickens here implied that he doesn’t agree the upper class treat the poor badly, meanwhile, he doesn’t agree the lower-class to overthrow the upper class. He hopes that they can live in harmony with each other. Underneath the lines, Dickens wants his readers to be careful that the same sort of revolution that so damaged France wont happen in Britain, which is shown to be nearly as unjust as France. But his warning is addressed not to the British lower classes, but to the aristocracy. He repeatedly uses the metaphor of sowing and reaping; if the aristocracy continues to plant the seeds of a revolution through behaving unjustly, they can be certain of harvesting that revolution in time. The lower classes do not have any agency in this metaphor: they sim* react to the behavior of the aristocracy. In this sense it can be said that while Dickens sympathizes with the poor, he identifies with the rich: they are the books audience, its "us" rather than its "them". Crush humanity out of shape once more, under similar hammers, and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind.
The Book Report of
A Tale of Two Cities
英语08-5班
0808010504
王童心
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incre*ty, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way
Charles Dickens(1812～1870),one of the greatest novelist in England. I have read his A tale of two cities .And this is the beginning of the book.
“A Tale of Two Cities”, one of Dickens’ works, is a well-known long story. And it has a great influence on the society at that time. When I saw the title at first, I thought it might tell something about the developing process of two cities, which might be no fun. However, after reading it , I found I had been wrong.
It portrays a brutal, bloody and revengeful society as well as love and friendship. It happened before and after the Revolution in France. The ruthless and cruel landowners and noblemen exploited the miserable people who owned nothing, but these poor people worked for others day and night. Noblemen had the power that one word would doubtlessly send others to prison. As time passed by, the noise of the coming-up revolution storm in Paris was growing louder and louder. At last, it was on the fourteenth of July, 1789 that the revolution broke out.
“The Bastille and its officers were in the hands of people, and the people wanted revenge and blood.” The true Freedom of France came. “The Guillotine, the new machine of death, cut off the heads of many, many people-not only the powerful and the cruel, but also the beautiful, the innocent, and the good.” Among the good, there was a man called Darney. Even though his father, wife and friends knew he was innocent, the people thought he was the enemy and would go to the Guillotine.
In spite of a shadow of fear and hate here and there, we can also see the great and kind persons. I think the greatest person is Mr. Manette who had been a prisoner in the Bastille for eighteen years. What he suffered was difficult to imagine, but he was still kind and loved his daughter. He did his best to save his son-in-law, whose father and uncle were the men that had ever sent him to prison. Another great man is the lawyer, Sydney Carton, a friend of Darney. Before Darney went to Guillotine, Mr. Carton changed places with him and he said, “It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever know.” Besides, the story is full of love, including the love between father and daughter, the love between husband and wife, the love among friends and so on. In short, only if you have love in your heart, the life is meaningful. At the same time, the revenge will run away with you, freedom and happiness will be around you.
There is no doubt that Charles Dickens is one of the greatest writers
in English. From this book, I see some true lives and moving stories from the old ages. I think you must feel the same as me that we don’t want to live in that condition. To be frank, we all look forward to living in a peaceful and love situation. Though the present life has improved a lot, there are still wars in some places. All that we need is to solve the problems in peaceful ways instead of by force. So let’s work hard together in order to make our life much more meaningful and happier, make our society more harmonious.
Today, I finally read the book of two cities by the British writer Charles Dickens. After reading this book, I was in a long mood.
Novels in the 18th century French revolution as the background, the story will be in Paris, London, link up the two big cities, a narrative horse nate doctor is full of love and adventure, interspersed with the nobles cruelty, peoples anger, trial spy... It mainly reveals the social order of the British and French in that period, and the life of the nobles and the ordinary people.
The book focuses on the fact that poor Dr Manette, who had been imprisoned in the bastille for 19 years by the aristocracy, had his daughter taken to live in England. In court, the father and daughter met the French nobleman darley and the poor master carton. Later, manettes daughter Lucy and darley married, and after ten years of happy family life, caton also gave Lucy a promise to make Lucy happy.
The people living in poor and helpless, cold and hunger, the plight of poor sickness repeatedly, suffered oppression, their hearts a backlog of deep and deep hatred of nobility, finally triggered the French revolution to overthrow the regime, for freedom. After the outbreak of the French revolution, darley went to France to defend his innocent servant, but he was arrested for being a French aristocrat. And carton, in order to make the promise of lucies life happy, used him to be similar to darley, and, before he was sentenced to death, he replaced him with Dudley, and replaced him with the guillotine.
The dark ages have passed, the days of hope and light have come, and the darkness is terrible! At first, the world belongs to the king, and later, the world belongs to the people. On July 13, 1789, the people stormed the bastille, where political prisoners were held; On January 21, 1793, the revolution brought king Louis xvi to the guillotine, which symbolized the end of feudal rule. On 20 February 1793, the first republic of France was established.
The 18th century, full of darkness and oppression, is gone, and the miserable life of the people is over. We have ushered in the 21st century, which is to be bathed in hope, and the long years from that era to today are as brief as they were yesterday. I think that the spirit of carton is worthy of our study, he is affectionate, he keeps his promise, in order to fulfill his promise to Lucy, at all costs, including precious life.
The people of today will never let history repeat itself, nor will history repeat itself. Let us live each day and make our 21st century more glorious!
A Tale of Two Cities was written by Charles Dickens, who was born in Portsmouth, England in 1812. As the second of eight children, Dickens had to go to work at the age of twelve to support his poor family, and he lived a difficult childhood. This troublesome time scarred him dee* and provided him with substantial material for such stories as Oliver Twist, David Copperfield, and Great Expectations. Though just accepted only little education, Dickens became a famous writer through his struggling self-learning and extremely hard work, and he was the representative writer of realism in the 19th century.
Charles Dickens lived in the period of transition between feudalism and capitalism, when the industrial revolution originated in England swept through Europe. As large numbers of workers invaded into urban centers to earn a living, the bourgeois took advantages of the surplus of labor by keeping wages low. The poor thus remained poor, and often lived in a narrow and filthy environment. Dickens’ writing depicted various directions about this society, and provided a keen, sympathetic chronicle of the plight of the urban poor.
A Tale of Two Cities mainly about the great atrocities of French aristocrats compelled the poor citizens to resist violently. Doctor Manette spent eighteen years as a prisoner in Bastille because he intended to expose the atrocity after learning that
Marquis Evrémonde killed a beautiful farmwife and her younger brother because of his brother’s lust. After Doctor Manette was free again, his daughter Lucie got married with Charles Darnay, Marquis Evrémonde’s nephew, but chose to live in England because he could not accept the cruel injustices of the French social system and the snobbish and cruel values of his uncle. However, Marquis Evrémonde continued his atrocities. After his crazy carriage crushed over a farmer’s little baby as if nothing happen, he was killed at night. A revolutionary storm was brewing. Mr. and Mrs.Defarge were the revolutionaries in the poor Saint Antoine section of Paris. They wanted to kill all French aristocrats, including Charles Darnay. Mr.Defarge used to be Doctor Manette’s servant, so he was kind to Manettes, while his wife’s heart burned with longing for revenge. At last, Charles Darnay was judged to death, But Sydney Carton, a lawyer who loved Lucie dee*, willing to die instead of Darnay, as they had similar appearance.
From my personal point of view, the person A Tale of Two Cities described astounded me very much. Some of them were cruel, crazy and reasonless, while some of them were kind, moral and had own mind.
Sydney Carton was the person I thought the most. He was a smart attorney, without his help, Mr. Stryver could not solve any cases. But he was lazy, alcoholic, and cared nothing and nobody, he even could not find any interests in his own life, it seems that he lived just for wasting life. But he loved Lucie dee*. Finally, he became a hero, because he sacrificed his life to save Darnay. I didn’t know why the author spent so many words to form such a strange guy at frist, he used his life to love Lucie, after all. But now, I caught it. Perhaps the terrible Carton symbolized the terrible old France, and his change in the end shown that everything could change, including the old France, a new and fine society would replace the violence.
Then, Charles Darnay. He was worthy of esteem or respect. He displayed great virtue in his rejection of his uncle, Marquis Evrémonde. Money and power meant nothing to him, if they came from exploitation and oppression. Even though he had to inherit his uncle’s bequest, he left them to the poor and lived in London throught his own effort. When he realized that he must go back to Paris to help Gabelle, one of his servants, and make right the wrong his uncle had done, he acted without hesitation because he knew that was his duty. He even refused Carton’s help after he was judged to death. I thought, Charles Darnay was a shiny diamond in that cruel and violent society, and he was a hope, the hope of equality and peace.
Third, Mrs.Defarge. How crazy this woman was. Nobody could stop her steps toward revenge, except the death. Although it said that wherever there is oppression, there is resistance, I didn’t agree with Mrs.Defarge totally. Her resistance was inhumane, insensible and endless. For just as the aristocracy’s oppression had made an oppressor Mrs.Defarge herself, so will her oppression, in turn, make oppressors her victims. In the end of the novel, her death by a bullet from her own gun. It shown the author’s belief that inordinate retaliated lust would destroy one own self.
On the whole, A Tale of Two Cities is a successful novel. It shows us oppression and resistance, violence and terror, revolution and vengeance, love and friendship.
I am lucky enough to live in the 21st century, when peace and development are pursued all along. Nowadays, there also are many problems and dissensions among this world, but violence does not the best way problems are solved. Violence just creates more problems, something every sensible person knows. What we need are talks and communication. The time A Tale of Two Cities mentions has gone, we should do enough preparation to adapt the coming age.
"A tale of two cities" is one of Dickenss most important representative works.The novel profoundly exposed the society contradiction before the French Revolution,intensely attacks the aristocratic social class is dissolute and cruel,and sincerely sympathizes with the depressed classes.The novel also described many magnificent scenes like the revolt people attacked Bastille and so on,which displayed peoples great strength. The novel has portrayed many different people. Doctor Manette is honest and kind but suffers the persecution actually , Lucie is beautiful and gentle ,Charles is graceful and noble,Lorry is upright and honest ,Sydney is semblance of indifferent, innermost feelings of warm,unconventional but also selfless and lofty,Miss Pross is straightforward and loyal,Evremonde brothers are cruel and sinister......The plex hatred is hard to solve, the cruel revenge has made more hatreds, loves rebirth in the hell edge,but take the life as the price. As an outstanding writer,in Dickenss work,the language skill is essential.Each kind of rhetoric technique,like the ***ogy,the exaggeration,the contrast,the humorous,and the taunt are handled skillfully,and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak."A tale of two cities" has its difference with the general historical novel, its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes.With the broad real background of the French Revolution,the author take the fictional character Doctor Manettes experience as the main clue,interweaves the unjust charge, love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together,the plot is criss-crossed,and the clue is plex.The author use narrates,foreshadowing,upholstery and so many techniques,causes the structure integrity and strictness,the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature,it displayed the remarkable artistic skill.the style "A tale of two cities" is solemnity and melancholy,fills indignantion,but lacks the humor of the early works.
——双城记读后感10篇
《双城记》是英国作家查尔斯·狄更斯所著的一部以法国大革命为背景所写成的长篇历史小说，情节感人肺腑，是世界文学经典名著之一，故事中将巴黎、伦敦两个大城市连结起来，围绕着曼马内特医生一家和以德法日夫妇为首的圣安东尼区展开故事。小说里描写了贵族如何败坏、如何残害百姓，人民心中积压对贵族的刻骨仇恨，导致了不可避免的法国大革命，本书的主要思想是为了爱而自我牺牲。书名中的“双城”指的是巴黎与伦敦。
故事中将巴黎、伦敦两个大城市连结起来，围绕着曼马内特医生一家和以德发日夫妇为首的圣安东尼区展开故事。小说里描写了贵族如何败坏、如何残害百姓，人民心中积压对贵族的刻骨仇恨，导致了不可避免的法国大革命。书名中的“双城”指的是巴黎与伦敦。
该小说创作于19世纪50年代，正处于英国资本主义经济快速发展时期，资本主义发展带来的种种罪恶和劳动人民生活的贫困化，导致下层群众中存在极端的愤懑与不满，英国社会处于爆发一场社会大革命的边缘，这与18世纪末法国的社会现状极为相似，狄更斯通过对两个城市的.对比，给当时的英国社会以借鉴及警醒。
《双城记》这本书是出自英国作家———秋更斯之手。他还写过《雾都孤儿》《匹克威克外传》等长篇小说和《圣诞故事集》《董贝父子》等短篇小说。
这篇文章主要写了“复活”“金钱”与“暴风雨踪迹”，这三个故事，小说以马泰特医生的曲折遭遇为线索，将冤狱，爱情与复仇三个对立又互相关联的故事交织在一起，用压迫和报复组成的一个故事。
故事中，梅尼特医生从监狱中重获自由和女儿一起到了伦敦生活。五年之后，他们在法庭上为名叫查尔斯？代尔那的法国青年做证，露西和代尔那因相爱而结婚。1792年，法国大革命爆发，故事场景转至法国。代尔那因身为贵族后裔而遭逮捕并判死刑，一直爱恋露西的英国青年西得尼？卡登替他上了断头台。
卡登是书中最富魅力亦最复杂的角色之一。颓废、消极，求学时，他只是替同学写作业；出了社会之后，即使是拥有了一身的才华，它仍然是选择为另一名律师工作。但是，在他冷漠的.外表下，有著深深的温柔。凭这一斛温柔和对露西的爱，卡登做了一个意义重大的决定———代替代尔那上断头台———用自己的生命换回另一个人的性命，换回一个家庭的幸福和笑颜。这是卡登守护露西的表现，为爱而牺牲，这在那个大时代、甚至现代，是多麼高贵的举动！
有人说，《双城记》是描写了两个男人和一个女人的故事，我却觉得，这样说的人必定没有了解作者真正想表达的意图。
西德尼·卡顿。
故事中，名医马奈特医生偶然目睹了封建贵族艾弗瑞蒙德兄弟草菅人命的暴行，因为打抱不*，反被投入巴士底狱。监禁了十八年。出狱后，马奈特之女露西却与仇家的儿子达内坠入情网，马奈特医生不计前嫌，宽容大量地允许了这门亲事。婚后的露西与达内生活幸福美满，并生养了一个健康可爱的女儿，可偏偏这时，卡顿登场了。
卡顿的出现，并没有在人们心中留下一个美好的印象。作为一个生不逢时、怀才不遇的穷律师，一个才华横溢却又自暴自弃的懦夫，一个自己都不知道自己是谁、要做什么事的人，又有谁会在意他呢！他有着几乎与达内一模一样英俊的面孔，有着爱露西甚至比达内更深的痴情。谁也没有想他那样爱着露西，那是何等庄重、深沉、博大、高尚的爱啊，他对露西的爱，早已超越了常人心中的自私自利，早已超越了常人心中的无私、无畏！谁能想到，在“情敌”达内遭诬陷而被判死刑，卡顿挺身而出，用自己与达内长相相似的“优势”，在狱中与达内互换身份，达内得救了，卡顿却走上了断头台。
卡顿对露西的爱情，虽闪现于一时，却持久了一世。
卡顿对于达内，他本该是恨的，因为是达内使卡顿失去了拥有露西的机会，是达内使露西眼中再无他人。但卡顿却选择了博大似海的爱来化解这种恨。也许，在卡顿眼里，达内早已不是卡内了，他是露西的一部分，是他所爱的人的一部分，是他所爱的一部分。卡顿是聪明的，他没有选择恨，而是将恨升华成一种最最伟大的爱，“为了你，为了你所亲爱的任何人，我愿意做任何事情。倘若我的生涯中有值得牺牲的可能和机会，我甘愿为你和你所爱的人而牺牲。”卡顿在《双城记》中告诉了我们什么事真爱，告诉了我们一个人应该有的对于爱情的信念。
露西是幸福的，她不仅拥有了父亲的爱，丈夫的爱，仆人的爱，更重要的是，她有着卡顿对她的那份仅仅属于她是爱情。在他幸福是，他只是默默地看着她，祝福她；在她不幸时，他就尽他最大的'可能去帮助她，代替“情敌”走上断头台。他死了，他为了露西而死，死得那么坦然，那么从容，也许，他走上断头台的那一刻，还在想着，露西此刻正倚在达内的肩头上甜甜地微笑呢。不过，卡顿不在乎，他不在乎露西身边的人是谁，不在乎露西此时心里想着的是谁，他只要露西此刻是幸福的，其余的，卡顿都不在乎。也许，卡顿心里，为所爱的人奉献一切应该是最幸福的是呢。
《双城记》给了我们太多的思考和感悟，关于爱，关于恨，关于复仇，也关于重生。不错，当人与人之间没有了恨，当所有的恨都升华为爱的时候，世界将没有复仇，没有血腥，有的只是幸福的欢笑，快乐的阳光！
前些日子借了一本超厚的世界名著《双城记》，看了几章后，我决定还了它，实在没意思，而且又看不懂，不过它的减肥版，总算看完它了。
书中人物其实很多，但人物的各种关系又是那么的令我意想不到，主人公是一个曾在巴士底狱当了18年的囚徒马内特医生，她的女儿露茜，他的女婿查尔斯……我对好人总有一种好感，对坏人总有一种厌恶感，不奇怪啊，每个人都这样，除非他是超级好人，对坏人存有仁慈的心，或者他是超级大坏蛋，对好人总有一种感觉，其实这也不奇怪的，事实就是如此！一群虚伪的家伙。得法热夫妇去找露茜，原以为要帮她的丈夫查尔斯，其实是害了她的丈夫再次入狱，并且最终导致卡登先生的死。
我本人觉得卡登先生很讲义气，重感情，他第一次见露茜就爱上她，虽然表白遭到拒绝，但对她的爱仍不改变，最后为了露茜能和她丈夫团聚，为了露茜不再伤心流泪，他去监狱和查尔斯调包了，用自己的命换了露茜的幸福，不能不说他是令我最受感动的一个人物。
“耶稣说，复活在我，生命也在我。信我的人，尽管死了，也一定会复活。所有活着信我的人，一定永生。”
——《圣经新约约翰福音》
可以毫不夸张地说，《双城记》是第一部真正打动我的小说。那个行为不端、前途黯淡的律师西德尼卡顿，亦是深深撼动了我。本着对爱情的忠贞，毅然决然的奔赴死亡，那种崇高，使他成为本作中最为浓墨重彩的一笔。
卡顿最开始的出场，说实话，是令人厌恶的。试想一下，一个自暴自弃、自甘堕落的穷酸律师，怎么能使别人对他产生好感？！但是在狄更斯的娓娓叙述下，再次呈现在我面前的是一位才华横溢的落魄青年，怀抱着难以想象的对爱情的义无反顾。也就是在他对露西小姐倾诉心肠后，我对卡顿的感情产生了极大的变化。
“我可以获取的最好的帮助，马奈特小姐，再这儿已经获得了。叫我在未来没落的残生至死不忘，我以前对你吐露过我的全部心声，除了你之外，这地球上不会再有人听到了。”
如此真实的肺腑之言，却透露着刻骨的无奈和悲哀。正如同遇见露西之前的卡顿，被盯上枷锁的命运似乎决定了他的一生。但也像他所说一样，露西的出现唤醒了卡顿往昔的梦想，点燃了爱的火种。这火光后来一直领着他向前，即便是走向断头台，他也无怨无悔。因为，在卡顿心里，为爱而作的牺牲是不需要计较的，就算为爱献出生命也是高尚的。
曾经有一个写手说：因为对爱的执着，卡顿的一生注定是带上悲剧色彩的。但是我并不这么认为，生命的终结并不一定代表着不幸。对于卡顿来说，能为帮助露西而死是一种幸运。这让一直有强烈自卑感的卡顿第一次直视生活，第一次发掘到了生活的意义，第一次完美的运用自己的智慧拯救了心爱的女孩。我感到欣慰，因为卡顿心中的光明最终透过那层黑云露了出来。
在临死之前他用自己的无畏震撼了所有人，甚至是已经疯狂的法国民众。此时此刻，卡顿的爱已经不只是对露西的了，这份爱已经升华成为了“对时代变迁的憧憬和对被压迫者的关爱”。
“嘈杂的人声，许多张抬头注视的面孔，外围人群往前涌的脚步声，一块往前冲来，仿佛掀起一股滔天恶浪。转眼间，全部都消失了。二十三。”
看至第十五章/足音消失的时候正值深夜，灯光映照着泛黄的纸张，我伏在桌上哭得昏天黑地，即怨恨狄更斯为什么如此“狠毒”，又替卡顿能了却心愿而喜悦。伴随着矛盾的眼泪，我静静地读完了《双城记》。
其实，并不需要哭泣。
“那天夜里，整个城市都在议论他，说他是所有上断头台的人中表现最为镇定自若的一个。不少人甚至觉得他表情郑重的像个圣人。”
卡顿离开这个世界的时候，没有忧伤和难过，只有*静。还记得他对露西说的话吗？“地球上还有这样一个人，为了让你喜欢的人*安无事，他乐于付出自己的生命！”这样一个从一开始就了然自己命运的男子，不得不说是一个清醒者！
西德尼卡顿，用我的片面之言是无法说清楚他的。所以，用巴金老人对卡顿的评价结束这篇文章是最好的：
“多年以来，那个为了别人幸福而毅然走上断头台的英国人，像一位老朋友时时鞭笞激励着我，让我明白怎样使自己的生命闪光。”
这本《双城记》，是19世纪著名作家狄更斯十四部长片小说中最短的一部，但是也是最为惊险曲折。最惊心动魄的一部。
这本书它主要讲了一段爱恨交加的故事，故事中的卡顿，他是一名律师，但是他整天漫不经心自从他遇见了马内特医生之女露西，就不断的向她诉苦，这让露西知道了他有一颗善良的心。并且他也深深的爱上了她。可是卡顿知道，自己已无法挽回自己，就把这颗心给珍藏了起来……最后，卡顿为了露西的幸福，竟替和自己长得一模一样的达奈从容赴死。之后达奈和露西的子孙都在世世代代的留传着一个名字，西德尼·卡顿。
读完这本书以后，我陷入沉思：为什么德法日夫人不能像马内特医生一样，放弃恨，放弃恩，放弃杀他们所有人！卡顿为了露西都能从容赴死，而德法日夫人却为了自己的家时而被仇恨蒙了双眼，见到达奈就想杀光所有的人，难道就不能快快乐乐，幸福美满的过完下半辈子吗？想到这，我便为无辜的卡顿和达奈全家人留下了眼泪。
这本书便是我懂得了做人要心胸宽广。
《双城记》是狄更斯最重要的代表作之一，由狄更斯发表的作品，是他迟暮之年的巅峰之作。
我同我的孩子们和朋友们演出威尔基·柯林斯先生的戏剧《冰海深处》的时候，第一次构思了这部小说的主要想法。那时候，我产生了一种强烈的愿望，想亲自把这种想法体现出来；于是我驰骋想象，刻意精心而且兴趣盎然的追踪一个敏锐细致的旁观者非表现出来不可的那种心情感受。
我对这个想法越来越熟悉，同时它也就随之逐渐形成了目前这种形式。在整个写作过程中，我的心神意志完全为它所控制而贯注其中；迄今，我已经证实无误，这些卷页中的所作所为和所遭所受，宛如确实都是我自己亲身的所作所为和所遭所受的一样。
无论何时在书中提及法国人在革命以前或革命期间的情况，都是在对最可信赖的目击者确信无疑的情况下如实引述的。我的希望之一始终都是想多少增添一点点大家欢迎而且生动的方式，用来了解那个惊心动魄的时代，固然，要想给卡莱尔先生的那本令人惊叹之作所包含的哲理，增添任何一点点东西，则是谁也不能奢望的。
就这样被感动了。有人说爱情是自私的，但在狄更斯的小说《双城记》中，我能感受到一种超脱世俗的最纯洁、最崇高的爱。它隐藏在内心，但却无比的深厚；它默默地承受与煎熬，为的是使它维系的人幸福；它总是无私地付出，而不求一丁点儿的回报。这种爱在无形中上升到一个新境界，放出凄美而运人的光彩，成为了经典——引起人们对它的重新理解，带给人们最真、最切的情感体验。
《双城记》是一部波澜壮阔的历史与感人肺腑的爱情故事的交织 体。全书充溢着扑朔迷离的色彩，正映照了当代的时代气息。它用一连串引人入胜的故事作为杠架，细致地描写了法国大革命的前因后果，成就和错误，而主人公西德尼。卡尔顿、露西。曼内特和查尔斯。达尔内之间的`真挚的情感成为亮丽的一笔。
今天，终于读完了英。大文豪狄更斯的《双城记》，第一次看到这个书的名字就深深的吸引主了我的实现和好奇心，不敢轻易去尝试，它是那么神秘，那么厚重……不过，我现在还是鼓足勇气读完了。
《双城记》讲述的是1775——1785年这一混乱时期发生在哪是世界上最繁华和最混乱，最肮脏的英国和法国，这两个我一直向往的国度，整篇小说主要展现Lucy的家人及其朋友间伟大的友谊，伟大的爱。露西是一个法国医生马内特的女儿。
她温柔，美丽，善良赢得许多男士的倾心，其中包括她后来的丈夫达雷，还有最后为她的幸福而代她丈夫被送上断头台的卡顿。他们之间的爱是真诚的，是伟大的，当然还有一个最善良，最仁慈的人一直帮助他们一家，是当时动乱中仅存的一点光亮，他就是罗端，他时时地关心露西和她的家人，把他毕生的爱倾注在这一家人身上，爱他们远胜爱自己。同时，他又是一位兢兢业业的商人，他是少许有良知，善良的人们的一个缩影，一个精华，露西的丈夫达雷是法国以贵族的后人，由于认清了他的家族的罪恶，自动放弃侯爵头衔和继承权，独自到英国自食其力，他为人谦和，待人诚恳，和罗端一样是一位真正的绅士。
他把他的财产分给法国人民，然他的善心并没有得到好报，再1778年巴士底狱被攻占后，他因一忠实奴仆的来信恳求，回到久违的法国开始他的营救工作，然而在他刚踏上法国领土时就被抓进了福斯狱，以逃亡贵族的罪名罪名将她送上审判台。马内特医生，露西也纷纷来到法国拯救他，罗端刚好在法国，利用马内特蹲过巴士底狱地影响将他救出。
然而，命运总会让善良的人们多灾多难。就在他被释放的当天晚上又被抓起来，这次是马内特在狱中的手稿被小人所利用，将自己的女婿送上了断头台，这时一直在暗中保护着一家的卡顿发挥了他过人的律师职能，最终用自己的生命，换的露西一家的幸福，在露西心目中树立起一个永远高大的形象，这是伟大的爱与被爱。
卡顿是一个有头脑，非常聪明，洞察力非常强的职业律师，倘若在今天，他一定可以称法律界的名流，而在那时却英雄无用武之地，因此，他只能用酒来浇灌所有的烦恼，以及生不逢时给他带来的巨大创伤。在别人眼中他总是懒散的，堕落的，当然除了露西。
此外，还有普洛斯小姐，露西的忠诚的佣人和朋友，杰端这由坏到好的人物，给人们带来了希望。
原来我一直为止倾叹的法国人民并非我想象中那么完美，在这本书中更多地展现了他们革命时的邪恶的本性。
合上这本书，我觉得银行家罗瑞和律师卡顿有太多的相似之处，他们俩其实是惺惺相惜的，只不过卡顿隐藏的更深，直到最后，罗瑞才发现卡顿是个有感情的人，可是其实自始至终，卡顿一直就看穿了罗瑞那压抑的情感，因为他自也是这样一样将感情深深隐藏起来的人，所以他很能看懂罗瑞的心思。也正因为这样，卡顿才能觉察这个一向以“办公事”自居的银行家的感伤。故事刚开始时，卡顿就漫不经心的、毫不客气的戳中了罗瑞矛盾的内心，当时罗瑞对他的表现是气愤的，而当故事快结束时，他以真挚的口吻揭露公事公办的人又有私情流露时，罗瑞感到的是意外，他看到了卡顿的另外一面，或者是卡顿本来的样子。正因为惺惺相惜，卡顿最终才把转移露西的计划托付给了罗瑞，因为他们都是靠谱的人。
我们都是有才华、感情深厚的人，请不要因为一时的不如意，而消沉了自己的意志，也不要沉迷虚幻，给自己戴上假面；我们应该像卡顿一样找到自己的光明，为之奋斗。我们也曾态度满不在乎，也曾懒散轻蔑，也曾彷徨漂泊，也曾走投无路，但我们不能因此而沉沦，如果你沉沦了这将是最糟糕的时代，如果你为着光明儿奋斗，用才华和情感获取幸福，这将是最美好的时代！
——双城记读后感9篇
我最*作看英国著名作家狄更斯的代表作——《双城记》。
合上这本书，我觉得银行家罗瑞和律师卡顿有太多的相似之处，他们俩其实是惺惺相惜的，只不过卡顿隐藏的更深，直到最后，罗瑞才发现卡顿是个有感情的人，可是其实自始至终，卡顿一直就看穿了罗瑞那压抑的情感，因为他自也是这样一样将感情深深隐藏起来的人，所以他很能看懂罗瑞的心思。也正因为这样，卡顿才能觉察这个一向以“办公事”自居的银行家的感伤。
故事刚开始时，卡顿就漫不经心的、毫不客气的戳中了罗瑞矛盾的内心，当时罗瑞对他的表现是气愤的，而当故事快结束时，他以真挚的口吻揭露公事公办的人又有私情流露时，罗瑞感到的`是意外，他看到了卡顿的另外一面，或者是卡顿本来的样子。正因为惺惺相惜，卡顿最终才把转移露西的计划托付给了罗瑞，因为他们都是靠谱的人。
我们都是有才华、感情深厚的人，请不要因为一时的不如意，而消沉了自己的意志，也不要沉迷虚幻，给自己戴上假面；我们应该像卡顿一样找到自己的光明，为之奋斗。我们也曾态度满不在乎，也曾懒散轻蔑，也曾彷徨漂泊，也曾走投无路，但我们不能因此而沉沦，如果你沉沦了这将是最糟糕的时代，如果你为着光明儿奋斗，用才华和情感获取幸福，这将是最美好的时代！
《双城记》文中人性的思想最令我受触动，比如说狄更斯写的查尔斯吧，他为了他那“神圣的目标”而放弃了地位和财产，这和《复活》中的夏赫留朵夫没什么两样，都一样崇高；为了救人他进入明知有着异常危险的牢狱，他这种“明知山有虎，偏向虎山行”的崇高精神值得我们学*，不畏艰苦，不屈服恶势力，为了真理，竟不顾生命危险去救人，我实在佩服他。
在这本普普通通的小说里，我仿佛看见了许多不同的人，正直善良的马泰特医生、美丽大方的露西、优雅高尚的查尔斯、忠厚老实的洛瑞、扭曲了人生的德发奇太太、外表冷漠，内心热情的西德尼、豪爽的普洛士小姐、残忍的阴险的埃瑞豪兄弟。
作者在本书歪曲了历史，丑化了封建贵族，事实并不尽然，许多情景，如使马奈特医生含冤入狱的空白逮捕令，都是查尔斯冒着生命危险去救马奈特医生，英国人的首领为了怕别的国家说：“法国贵族欺压老百姓”。想要收买查尔特，用很高的地位和财产来收买，查尔特并没有收钱财的迷惑，查尔特改善欺压百姓的不懈努力的故事。
主要表现了关爱和行善、反映善恶博斗，爱恨交锋，最后作者所说：“爱总能战胜恨”，恶往往都是昙花一现，都要和作恶者一同死亡，而善则永世长存。”
全面地揭示了英国的社会面貌；议会政治的黑暗，统治机构的昏聩、金钱社会的罪恶、人民大众的贫穷。
用一个故事来对付自己同时代的的当权者和公众呼吁，*会引起暴力，危机*在旦夕，有钱人都应该已慈悲为怀，流血只能造成更多的流出更多的鲜血。
双城记是英国作家狄更斯的著作，是本脍炙人口、家喻户晓的名作。
以法国人民无法长期忍受苛捐杂税---*抽税、地主抽税、地方税、一般税的压榨剥夺，引发大革命为背景，描述一个爱恨情仇的缠绵故事。贵族艾雷蒙特兄弟抢夺良家妇女，造成家破人亡，名医玛瑞德无端卷入而形成冤狱，他於狱中留下遗书，见证事情的经过，却幸运获得生还。且在其爱女露西的悉心照顾、亲情的抚爱下恢复正常。
贵族的遗族艾雷蒙特，在母亲的遗言，要其尽力为这个残酷不仁的家庭弥补一切的罪过，免受天谴和诅咒。他嘱咐家仆将其家产救济贫苦的人，而改名为达雷，远走英国伦敦自立更生。被残害家庭留下一女孩，长大**後嫁给狄华奇，从事酒店生意，为报家仇而精心策动革命。
富有正义感的希里柯顿暗恋露西，但露西选择了贵族遗子达雷，柯顿不仅没有恼羞成怒而有所怨恨，反倒宣称：「为你和你所爱的人，我愿意做任何事。」达雷向露西求婚，露西的父亲--医生玛瑞德明知过去的恩怨细节，但为了女儿的幸福，认为只要女儿必须和达雷在一起，才会得到快乐和幸福，就把她托付给他，甚至对自己曾失去的那些岁月的回忆和生*最大的憾事(冤狱)。尊重儿女的抉择与考虑女儿的幸福，所显现的包容、宽宏胸襟的涵养修维，值得称颂和尊敬。
达雷和露西结婚後，育有一可爱女儿，生活美满幸福。然法国爆发革命，其家仆因执行他的命令而身陷囹圄，捎来书信求援，他不顾己身的安危，毅然决然赶回巴黎，深入险境而被囚禁在监狱中。露西与父亲闻讯赶赴救援，细节曲折，高潮迭起。最後因医生在狱的一封遗书而判定上断头台，执行前，追求露西不成的柯顿，为践履当年的承诺，善谋入狱营救。由自己取代达雷上断头台，掉包救走了露西的丈夫----达雷。
求仁得仁、慷慨就义的柯顿，上断头台前心情十分的*静，内心的话语，也是故事的结语如后：
「……看见一座美丽的城市在这可怕的地点建立起来，而且看到这些罪恶渐渐消失。在我看不到的英格兰那里，我看到以我自己生命换取的那些生命多麽可贵、有用而且快乐。我看见露西在喂一个男孩子的奶，这孩子的名字是用我的名字取的。我看见露西的父亲老到腰也弯了，但很*安很健康。
我看见露西成了一个老太婆，当她回忆到今天时，为我而哭泣。
我看见她和她的丈夫，到他们死後，并排躺在坟墓里，我知道他们两人在对方的心中所占的地位，都不会比我在他们俩的心灵中所占的地位更荣誉。
我看到那躺在她胸前和我一样名字的男孩长大**。他正在我昔日走过的人生旅途上努力前行。我看见他的成绩那麽好，使得我的名字因他而响亮起来。
我看见他带着一个金发的男孩子到这里来---我听到他用温和的声音，告诉他我的故事。
比起我以往所做的事，我现在所做的这件事是好多了;比起我所知到的安息来，我现在所得到的安息是更好多了。」
柯顿高尚而伟大的情操，对生命意义与价值的了悟，和认知态度，令人崇敬、感人肺腑。其实我们都不会活着回去，当我们做完我们来世上的工作，我们将摆脱病痛、恐惧和一切烦恼，宛如一只彩蝶飞回上帝身边……
假如我们一生没有得到别人的敬爱，而且也没有做任何一件让人惦记的有意义的事，我们的生命就只有诅咒和遗憾。怨恨使人变得大胆、丧失理智;而爱却使我们心中充满勇气，无怨无悔，坦然地去接受命定的结局。
《双城记》被誉为描写法国大革命的最杰出的代表作，我想最大的原因可能是因为它的与众不同。和其他的作品，比如卡莱尔的《法国大革命》不同，狄更斯更注重的是底层人民的喜怒哀乐。尽管在那个时代，这些小人物本身并不能引起世界的关注。但是作者敏锐的捕捉到这些小人物和大革命有着千丝万缕的联系，可以说法国大革命本身就是有小人物们的力量所引发的。
在这部作品里，我看到了很多很多不同的人。正直善良却惨遭迫害的马奈特医生，美丽温柔的露西，优雅高尚的查尔斯，忠厚老实的洛瑞，外表冷漠、内心热情，放荡不羁而又无私崇高的西德尼，扭曲了人性的德发奇太太，豪爽忠诚的普洛士小姐，残忍阴险的埃佛瑞蒙兄弟……复杂的仇恨纠缠不清，残忍的复仇制造了更多仇恨，爱在地狱的边缘再生，却是以生命为代价。这错综复杂的一幕幕，活生生的展现在面前，仿佛重现了那个失去理智的时代。有人说，《双城记》是描写了两个男人和一个女人的故事，我却觉得，这样说的人必定没有了解作者真正想表达的意图。如果只是表达了这个，任何一部作品都可以达到露西和查尔斯的水准，那么《双城记》的优势怎么体现出来呢？
在我看来，德发奇一家和法国贵族的仇恨也好，露西、查尔斯和西德尼的感情问题也好，都是为了体现一个共同的主题而设的。这个主题就是剖析这场大革命与民众之间的关系，看到底是什么引发了这场革命，到底这场血雨腥风给人们带来了什么。我想这才是作者想要表达的重心所在。
这个假期，我利用空余时间阅读了狄更斯的《双城记》，也有了些体悟，下面我来把我的感受写下来。
一、情节布置
这部著作的情节是十分玄妙的，作者把各种线索串联起来，如文中所说的一样“编织”成了这部小说。小说最大的特点是人物关系复杂：如马奈特医生和达南的关系；德发奇太太和达南的关系——这两个关系直接导致了最后的悲剧。还有洛瑞先生与德发奇的关系以及格仑舍与密探的关系等等。这些复杂的人物关系使此部著作情节环环相扣。
这本书最有特色的一个章节是顿临死前与一位小姑娘的对话，从这番对话中彻底揭示了革命群众过于疯狂以及善将永存的主旨。
二、人物特点
本书最重要的人物是查尔斯·达南（埃弗蒙德）。他是一个很矛盾的人，他非常憎恨自己的父亲与叔父，但是他还必须支撑整个家族的产业。所以，当老仆人给他写信时，他便不得不回到法国。他是一个善良的人，具备一位贵族所具有的文明气质，并且当他去会见自己的叔父时，他明确提出了“不能再迫害人民”的说法。同时，他放弃了贵族特权，本来就是一件善事。
悉尼·卡顿也是位重要人物。在读这部小说的前半部分时，我一直不大喜欢这个随意、懒惰的人物。但是在往后读的过程中，我发现他是一个敢作敢为、足智多谋的人。虽然是“朋友”，但实际上卡顿和达南的关系并没有那么好，但是为了他们一家人幸福滴生活，卡顿甘愿走上断头台，让达南逃跑，而自己成了永恒的善的化身。在文章中提到卡顿死时“犹如一位先知“。
德发奇夫妇也属于本书中的焦点人物。德发奇本人是个善良的人，他收留了马奈特医生，并且在大革命之后告诉自己的夫人见好就收。而德发奇太太就是个复仇者，她受过埃弗蒙德兄弟的迫害，所以她一心想杀掉法国所有贵族。当然，由于她的过激行为，使她最后死于普洛士小姐手中。
三．写作特色
本部小说文笔非常幽默，作者一直在使用辩证关系和反复的手法来实现这种效果，所以这部感人的小说还能读起来令人十分想笑。
文章有特色的一处是最后作者“帮助卡顿发表感想“。作者用卡顿的语言交待了文章的结局，告诉人们”善良在世界永存“的道理。
这就是我读过这部小说的感受。
小说分为三部分展开，前两部分主要为介绍故事背景和人物性格，最后一步走向故事高潮。狄更斯在文中处处埋下伏笔，每次读到不明白的地方都可以先略过，因为后边总会有意想不到的故事展开加以解释，一次又一次的冲击着读者。
在那贫苦的年代，小人物饱受煎熬；但在以暴制暴的年代，小人物又成了空洞的躯壳。就像张养浩《山坡羊·潼关怀古》的最后一句：兴，百姓苦；亡，百姓苦。
比起故事开篇的名句“这是最好的时代，这是最坏的时代。这是……”，我更喜欢结尾处卡顿的幻想，狄更斯的这段文字已然拥有了活得灵魂，百读不厌，引人深思。
最后还要说，以前不是很喜欢读长篇小说，觉得过于啰嗦而先看故事结局。但这篇小说一定不能先看结局，更不能先看带有剧透色彩的书评，不然带着答案看问题很难理解那种人性的光辉，那种在乱世中熠熠发光的博爱精神。
我觉得用英雄联盟里虞姬的台词来诠释这篇小说最为合适：风，不会带走你曾经存在过的证明。不为所爱之人哭泣，只因从未离去。
（看到最后一章，有个问题其实没弄明白。最后那个慷慨赴死的女人究竟是罗兰夫人还是查理十六王后）
今天，我终于读完了英国作家狄更斯的著作《双城记》。读完这本书，我的心情久久不能*静。
小说以18世纪的法国*为背景，故事中将巴黎、伦敦两个大城市连结起来，叙述马内特医生一家充满了爱与冒险的遭遇，中间穿插了贵族的残暴、人民的愤怒、审判间谍……主要揭示了那个时期英法的社会治安，以及大官贵族，下至*民百姓的生活。
这部著作主要讲述了：可怜的马内特医生在被贵族以“莫须有”的罪名关在巴士底狱十九年后，他的女儿将他接到了英国居住。在法庭上父女认识了法国贵族达雷和潦倒师父卡顿。后来，马内特的女儿露西和达雷结了婚，过了十年的幸福家庭生活，卡顿也给了露西一个，要让露西生活快乐。
人民生活在困苦无助、饥寒交迫、贫病连连、受尽欺压的困境中，他们心中积压了对贵族的刻骨深仇，终于引发了**、争取自由的法国*。法国*爆发后，达雷为了营救无辜的仆人，赶到法国去给他辩护，却因他曾是法国贵族而被拘捕了。而卡顿为了实践要让露西生活快乐的，利用他跟达雷相貌相似，在达雷被处刑前，用自己跟达雷掉包，代替他上了断头台。
黑暗的年代已经过去了，充满希望与光明的年代已经到来，那时的黑暗令人惨不忍睹！起先，天下是属于国王的，后来，天下是属于人民的。17*7月13日，人民攻占了关押政治犯的巴士底狱；1793年1月21日，革命把国王路易十六送上了断头台，这象征着封建统治的结束；1793年2月20日，成立法兰西第一共和国。
充满黑暗和压迫的18世纪已经一去不复返了，百姓受苦受难的悲惨生活已经彻底结束。我们迎来了被希望沐浴下的21世纪，从那个时代到今天的漫长岁月不过像昨天到今天那样短暂。我认为卡顿的精神是值得我们学*的，他重情义，信守诺言，为了实现他对露西的诺言，不惜一切代价，包括宝贵的生命。
当今的人民绝对不会让历史重演，历史也不会重演。让我们过好每一天，让属于我们的21世纪更加充满光彩！
人生历程，大抵逆境居十六七，顺境居十三四;南明顺逆两境又常相间经送乘。顺流逆流总在人生中交替不息。有些人在挫折面前，倒下了，甘心于失败与屈服，但更多的人在缓慢的人生长河游弋，泰然自若，即使遇到了惊涛骇浪，也无所畏惧，仍然昂着头，挺着胸，始向那成功的彼岸。
“天将降大任于斯人也，必先苦其心志，劳其筋骨，饿其体肤，空乏其身，行拂乱其所为，所以动心忍性，曾益其所不能。”在人生的旅途中，难免要遇到一些挫折，要想有所作为，就不应屈服于命运的安排。不要抱怨，不要消沉，因为挫折能磨练一个人的意志，挫折能锻炼一个人的品行。由此可见，挫折是通往成功的第一条道路。回首中华历史五千载，成大事者无一不是从挫折与苦难之中磨练出来的，挫折是勾践卑事夫差三年，卧薪尝胆，成功是越国灭掉吴国，成就了一代伟业;挫折是司马迁含冤被投入狱中，遭受腐刑，成功是一部《史记》，留伟数千载;挫折是剧作家曹禺三次落榜，从医梦破灭，成功是《雷雨》、《日出》等作品震憾人心。试问，如果没有挫折，他们都生活在安逸的环境之中，他们都过着*静的生活，他们能否成就辉煌，名垂青史，千古流芳?可见，*静的湖面，练不出精悍的水手，安逸的环境，选不出时代的伟人，惟有挫折是通往成功的第一条道路。
沿着成功的一条路上，有许多事先无法预料的挫折排列着，最后的成功是在能用坚毅的精神、伶俐的眼光，从挫折中汲取营养，从失败中吸收教训，利用他们，向前猛进。
挫折不仅成就了*的伟人，同样为外国名人成功奠定了基础。
面对耳聋的折磨，德国著名音乐家贝多芬喊出：“我要扼住生命的咽喉，决不能让命运使我屈服。”直到现在，他仍作为我们崇敬的对象活在我们心中。
面对贫困和屈辱，英国杰出现实主义批判作家狄更斯，不懈地学*和斗争，一部《双城记》丰富了世界进步文学的宝库。
作为一名高中生，我们要学*先辈们的精神，在挫折面前，永不退缩，坚持不懈，攀登知识高峰。
在人生的旅途中，我们难免会滑落、跌倒，甚至会摔得头破血流，但当我们战胜了自己，继续攀登、前行，才会发现成功的彼岸就在不远处。
永远相信，挫折是通往成功的第一条道路。
让我感觉最深的特点是，每一个人物的存在和功效都是满打满的。为什么要提到普洛斯小姐的混账弟弟，因为后面要靠他翻盘；为什么卡顿一定是一个被人生大浪击倒的“律师”而不是别的什么职业，因为最后要靠他高超的专业素养进行谈判而达成他生命中最重要的计划。
关于人性，我想最真实的可能是德法奇夫妇。从德法奇太太身上，我们能看到被复仇笼罩的人是有多么的坚如磐石，刀枪不入流水不侵，我们会埋怨她为什么不能就事论事，莫因血缘姓氏就一棍子打死好人，但那是幼时真实遭受血亲消亡的灵魂，它的'扭曲可以不被原谅，但是绝对不能不被理解；对照存在的德法奇先生也很真实，有同样坚决的、教养不高的、痛恨贵族的心，但也有丝丝裂纹，会为无辜的敌人家庭阵痛，但是刹那间淹没在洪流中。最后，达奈为了救一个在我们看来不是很值的人回国那里让我感受到了非常典型的义的形象，卡顿非常有力地显现出爱的力量，尤其是在他先前堆砌形象的对比下。
我想我们要感受这些东西，因为在现在的我们看来，某些人物过于理想化，因为呈现了某些太好的品质，而不够真实。但是教育意义是有的，经常耳濡目染，不要因为不相信美的存在就不想变美，还有有点用的。
——双城记读后感6篇
我最*作看英国著名作家狄更斯的代表作——《双城记》。
合上这本书，我觉得银行家罗瑞和律师卡顿有太多的相似之处，他们俩其实是惺惺相惜的，只不过卡顿隐藏的更深，直到最后，罗瑞才发现卡顿是个有感情的人，可是其实自始至终，卡顿一直就看穿了罗瑞那压抑的情感，因为他自也是这样一样将感情深深隐藏起来的人，所以他很能看懂罗瑞的心思。也正因为这样，卡顿才能觉察这个一向以“办公事”自居的银行家的感伤。
故事刚开始时，卡顿就漫不经心的、毫不客气的戳中了罗瑞矛盾的内心，当时罗瑞对他的表现是气愤的，而当故事快结束时，他以真挚的口吻揭露公事公办的人又有私情流露时，罗瑞感到的`是意外，他看到了卡顿的另外一面，或者是卡顿本来的样子。正因为惺惺相惜，卡顿最终才把转移露西的计划托付给了罗瑞，因为他们都是靠谱的人。
我们都是有才华、感情深厚的人，请不要因为一时的不如意，而消沉了自己的意志，也不要沉迷虚幻，给自己戴上假面；我们应该像卡顿一样找到自己的光明，为之奋斗。我们也曾态度满不在乎，也曾懒散轻蔑，也曾彷徨漂泊，也曾走投无路，但我们不能因此而沉沦，如果你沉沦了这将是最糟糕的时代，如果你为着光明儿奋斗，用才华和情感获取幸福，这将是最美好的时代！
《双城记》是狄更斯最重要的代表作之一，由狄更斯发表的作品，是他迟暮之年的巅峰之作。
我同我的孩子们和朋友们演出威尔基·柯林斯先生的戏剧《冰海深处》的时候，第一次构思了这部小说的主要想法。那时候，我产生了一种强烈的愿望，想亲自把这种想法体现出来；于是我驰骋想象，刻意精心而且兴趣盎然的追踪一个敏锐细致的旁观者非表现出来不可的那种心情感受。
我对这个想法越来越熟悉，同时它也就随之逐渐形成了目前这种形式。在整个写作过程中，我的心神意志完全为它所控制而贯注其中；迄今，我已经证实无误，这些卷页中的所作所为和所遭所受，宛如确实都是我自己亲身的所作所为和所遭所受的一样。
无论何时在书中提及法国人在革命以前或革命期间的情况，都是在对最可信赖的目击者确信无疑的情况下如实引述的。我的希望之一始终都是想多少增添一点点大家欢迎而且生动的方式，用来了解那个惊心动魄的时代，固然，要想给卡莱尔先生的那本令人惊叹之作所包含的哲理，增添任何一点点东西，则是谁也不能奢望的。
那是最美好的时代，那是最糟糕的时代;那是智慧的年头，那是愚昧的年头;那是信仰的时期，那是怀疑的时期;那是光明的季节，那是黑暗的季节;那是希望的春天，那是失望的冬天;我们全都在直奔天堂，我们全都在直奔相反的方向--简而言之，那时跟现在非常相象，某些最喧嚣的权威坚持要用形容词的最高级来形容它。说它好，是最高级的;说它不好，也是最高级的。
这是整本小说的开头第一章，将全小说的基调定上了悲剧色彩，然而就在这矛盾的时代中，也确实存在过光明。
这本小说叙述了法国大革命时期围绕在医生马奈特一家周围的事，这本小说颠覆了我对自由，权利以及善恶的看法——法国人民不堪重负，推翻了波旁王朝，然而新*建立之后朝他们走来的难道是他们心驰神往的自由吗?不，仍然是以往的提心吊胆，稍不留神明天就会被送上断头台。得势之后的德发日太太滥用职权，将死敌们个个置于死地，最后却落得个惨死的下场。正如那句话所说的：“自由啊，有多少罪恶是假借你的名义干出来的。”大革命并不如想象中的那么美好，而是以暴易暴。它没有拯救人民，而是将人民推入了另一个火坑。
再来看看另外一位大革命的牺牲品——达内，革命前，他放弃了国内的家业，只身来到英国谋生，在他看来，压迫人民是一件极不人道的事，然而，革命爆发后，他反而无辜地成为人民的敌人，人们不分青红皂白地要将他领上断头台。不过相信在九死一生之后，他依然是原先那个善良的达内。
而卡顿——一个才华横溢却自甘堕落的律师，他与达内有着相同的长相，却有着不同的命运，在面对活着还是让自己心爱的人得到幸福的抉择时，毅然决然的选择了后者，在他看来，生命在爱的面前是微不足道的，即使在断头台上，他也表现出了令人难以想象的沉着冷静。因为在他的心底，一直有一个信念在支持他：“耶稣说，复活在我，生命也在我，信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活。凡活着信我的人，必永远不死。”他用死完成了自我救赎，他用死来反抗虚伪的革命者，他用死来诠释对露丝的爱。生命，成了他最后的武器，爱，成了他唯一的支柱。
前些日子借了一本超厚的世界名著《双城记》，看了几章后，我决定还了它，实在没意思，而且又看不懂，今天我借了它的减肥版，总算看完它了。书中人物其实很多，但人物的各种关系又是那么的令我意想不到，主人公是一个曾在巴士底狱当了18年的囚徒马内特医生，她的女儿露茜，他的女婿查尔斯…
英国和法国就是所谓的双城，小说的背景也就是法国大革命，我是学历史的，关于法国大革命我是清楚的，联系到小说中，我真想问一下，是真的吗?小说嘛，多半是虚构的，看完之后，给我的印象是：狠毒的得法热夫人，无辜的查尔斯，好得无话可说的西得尼`卡登先生，忠心的女仆人小姐，热心肠的贾维斯`劳里先生…
我对好人总有一种好感，对坏人总有一种厌恶感，不奇怪啊，每一个人都这样，除非他是超级好人，对坏人存有仁慈的心，或者他是超级大坏蛋，对好人总有一种感觉，“他们好虚伪啊!”其实这也不奇怪的，事实就是如此嘛!一群虚伪的家伙。得法热夫妇去找露茜，原以为要帮她的丈夫查尔斯，其实是害了她的丈夫再次入狱，并且最终导致卡登先生的死.我本人觉得卡登先生很讲义气，重感情，他第一次见露茜就爱上她，即使表白遭到拒绝，但对她的爱仍不改变，最后为了露茜能和她丈夫团聚，为了露茜不再伤心流泪，他去监狱和查尔斯调包了，用自己的命换了露茜的幸福，不能不说他是令我最受感动的一个人物。
《双城记》是狄更斯最重要的代表作之一，由狄更斯发表的作品，是他迟暮之年的巅峰之作。
我同我的孩子们和朋友们演出威尔基·柯林斯先生的戏剧《冰海深处》的时候，第一次构思了这部小说的主要想法。那时候，我产生了一种强烈的愿望，想亲自把这种想法体现出来；于是我驰骋想象，刻意精心而且兴趣盎然的追踪一个敏锐细致的旁观者非表现出来不可的那种心情感受。
我对这个想法越来越熟悉，同时它也就随之逐渐形成了目前这种形式。在整个写作过程中，我的`心神意志完全为它所控制而贯注其中；迄今，我已经证实无误，这些卷页中的所作所为和所遭所受，宛如确实都是我自己亲身的所作所为和所遭所受的一样。
无论何时在书中提及（即令是仅仅略为涉及）法国人在革命以前或革命期间的情况，都是在对最可信赖的目击者确信无疑的情况下如实引述的。我的希望之一始终都是想多少增添一点点大家欢迎而且生动的方式，用来了解那个惊心动魄的时代，固然，要想给卡莱尔先生的那本令人惊叹之作所包含的哲理，增添任何一点点东西，则是谁也不能奢望的。
总结：《双城记》这部历史小说的创作动机在于借古讽今，以法国大革命的历史经验为借鉴，给英国统治阶级敲响警钟。
那是最美好的时代，那是最糟糕的时代;那是智慧的年头，那是愚昧的年头;那是信仰的时期，那是怀疑的时期;那是光明的季节，那是黑暗的季节;那是希望的春天，那是失望的冬天;我们全都在直奔天堂，我们全都在直奔相反的方向--简而言之，那时跟现在非常相象，某些最喧嚣的权威坚持要用形容词的最高级来形容它。说它好，是最高级的;说它不好，也是最高级的。
这是整本书的开头第一章，将全书的基调定上了悲剧色彩，然而就在这矛盾的时代中，也确实存在过光明。
这本书叙述了法国大革命时期围绕在医生马奈特一家周围的事，这本书颠覆了我对自由，权利以及善恶的看法——法国人民不堪重负，推翻了波旁王朝，然而新*建立之后朝他们走来的难道是他们心驰神往的自由吗?不，仍然是以往的提心吊胆，稍不留神明天就会被送上断头台。得势之后的德发日太太滥用权利，将死敌们个个置于死地，最后却落得个惨死的下场。正如那句话所说的：“自由啊，有多少罪恶是假借你的名义干出来的。”大革命并不如想象中的那么美好，而是以暴易暴。它没有拯救人民，而是将人民推入了另一个火坑。
再来看看另外一位大革命的牺牲品——达内，革命前，他放弃了国内的家业，只身来到英国谋生，在他看来，压迫人民是一件极不人道的事，然而，革命爆发后，他反而无辜地成为人民的敌人，人们不分青红皂白地要将他领上断头台。不过相信在九死一生之后，他依然是原先那个善良的达内。
而卡顿——一个才华横溢却自甘堕落的律师，他与达内有着相同的长相，却有着不同的命运，在面对活着还是让自己心爱的人得到幸福的抉择时，毅然决然的选择了后者，在他看来，生命在爱的面前是微不足道的，即使在断头台上，他也表现出了令人难以想象的沉着冷静。因为在他的心底，一直有一个信念在支持他：“耶稣说，复活在我，生命也在我，信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活。凡活着信我的人，必永远不死。”他用死完成了自我救赎，他用死来反抗虚伪的革命者，他用死来诠释对露丝的爱。生命，成了他最后的武器，爱，成了他唯一的支柱。
——双城记的读后感 (菁华3篇)
法国大革命是人类史上一个血的印记。在那个混乱的时代，充满不确定；在这种无秩序的状态下，人性的一切表露无疑。双城记以法国大革命为背景，透过为族与*民之间的仇恨冲突，作者狄更斯只想传达出———鲜血无法洗去仇恨，更不能替代爱———贵族的暴虐对*民造成的伤痛不会因为鲜血而愈合，*民对贵族的仇恨也无法替代对已逝亲人的爱。
故事中，梅尼特医生从监狱中重获自由和女儿一起到伦敦生活。五年后，他们在法庭上为名叫查尔斯？代尔那的法国青年做证，露西和代尔那因相爱而结婚。 792年，法国大革命爆发，故事场景转至法国。代尔那因身为贵族后裔而遭逮捕并判死刑，在千钧一发的时刻，一直爱恋露西的英国青年西得尼？卡登替他上了断头台。
卡登是书中最富魅力亦最复杂的角色之一。颓废、消极，求学时，他只替同学写作业；出社会后，即使拥有一身才华，它仍然选择为另一名律师工作，但是，在他冷漠的外表下，有著深深的温柔。凭这一斛温柔和对露西的爱，卡登做了一个意义重大的决定———代替代尔那上断头台———用自己的生命换回另一个人的性命，换回一个家庭的幸福和笑颜。这是卡登守护露西的表现，为爱而牺牲，这在那个大时代、甚至现代，是多麼高贵的举动！
相较於代表的温柔和爱，多法石太太则是杀戮和血腥的象徵。由於亲人惨死在代尔那的父亲和叔叔的魔掌下，她终其一生为仇恨而活；为置代尔那一家於死地，无所不用其极，最后终於让自己死於擦枪走火的意外。多法石太太的嗜血固然使人不寒而栗，但也叫人不禁感叹恨的力量，将本该快乐幸福的女人塑造成复仇女神。十八世纪末的法国，被这种执拗复仇的火焰燃烧成阿修罗地狱。
教训和意义不能因为岁月而被遗忘。如果我们无法从其中获得一些什麼，相同的悲剧依旧会重演。两百年后的今天，希望活在这个世代的我们能创造出真正*等、自由、博爱的新世纪。
卡登的死，就像一支羽毛轻柔的飘落水面，没有水花，却有一个个涟漪，提醒人们：真正的自由*等无法用断头台建立。有一天，世界会变得更好，就像卡登临死前看见的世界，那不是天堂的幻影；有一天，那会是我们的世界。
《双城记》是狄更斯最重要的代表作之一。在法国大革命广阔的真实背景下，他以虚构人物梅尼特医生的经历为主线索，把冤狱、爱情与复仇三个互相独立而又互相关联的故事交织在一起，情节错综，头绪纷繁。早在创作《双城记》之前很久，狄更斯就对法国大革命极为关注，反复研读英国历史学家卡莱尔的《法国革命史》和其他学者的有关著作。他对法国大革命的浓厚兴趣发端于对当时英国潜伏着的严重的社会危机的担忧。1854年底，他说：“我相信，不满情绪像这样冒烟比火烧起来还要坏得多，这特别像法国在第一次革命爆发前的公众心理，这就有危险，由于千百种原因——如收成。
这部小说塑造了三类人物。一类是以厄弗里蒙地侯爵兄弟为代表的封建贵族，他们“唯一不可动摇的哲学就是压迫人”，是作者痛加鞭挞的对象。另一类是得伐石夫妇等革命群众。必须指出的是，他们的形象是被扭曲的。例如得伐石的妻子狄安娜，她出生于被侮辱、被迫害的农家，对封建贵族怀着深仇大恨，作者深切地同情她的悲惨遭遇，革命爆发前后很赞赏她坚强的性格、卓越的才智和非凡的组织领导能力;但当革命进一步深入时，就笔锋一转，把她贬斥为一个冷酷、凶狠、狭隘的复仇者。尤其是当她到医生住所搜捕路茜和小路茜时，更被表现为嗜血成性的狂人。最后，作者让她死在自己的枪口之下，明确地表示了否定的态度。第三类是理想化人物，是作者心目中以人道主义解决社会矛盾、以博爱战胜仇恨的榜样，包括梅尼特父女、代尔纳、劳雷和卡尔登等。梅尼特医生被侯爵兄弟害得家破人亡，对侯爵兄弟怀有深仇大恨，但是为了女儿的爱，可以摒弃宿仇旧恨;代尔纳是侯爵兄弟的子侄，他大彻大悟，谴责自己家族的罪恶，抛弃爵位和财产，决心以自己的行动来“赎罪”。这对互相辉映的人物，一个是贵族*的受害者，宽容为怀;一个是贵族侯爵的继承人，主张仁爱。他们中间，更有作为女儿和妻子的路茜。在爱的纽带的维系下，他们组成一个互相谅解、感情融洽的幸福家庭。
查尔斯·狄更斯的《双城记》篇幅并不长，但是，却读了半个月之久。实在是因为刚开始的时候，并没有太读懂，对于当时的时代背景，西欧的风俗*惯都不了解。直到现在，虽然已经读到了结尾，其实对作者本身要表达的当时法国大革命的一些令人“废解”的景象，并没有更尽一步的了解。
但是通过对这部著作的学*，我有几点需要思考的`地方：
首先，是什么让一个本该受人同情女人变成了让读者希望她早点死去的角色。泰雷兹·德伐日是个苦大仇深的人物，她为了复仇，甚至失去了作为普通人应有的怜悯之心，她不但把达尔内送上了断头台，还要把本是受害者的曼内特医生，以及达尔内的妻女也“斩草除根”。她的每次出现，她的言论，甚至让人觉得疯狂、可怕、恐惧，她给人带来的是一种无可救药的绝望。
其次，是什么让民众面对囚犯时先后能有截然不同的两种态度。让我吃惊的是，在第一次达尔内被捕时，当时的民众在得知达尔内的“罪过”后，希望他马上被处以死刑的急迫心情，和当法庭宣布他无罪时民众们所表现出来的欢喜之情，形成了鲜明的对比，让人无法理解。
再次，是什么让一位本来欲自暴自弃过一辈子的人，为了所爱的人，竟然可以献出了生命。西德尼·卡尔顿对爱情的执着让人钦佩，他成了全书中最具灵魂的角色。所以把最后他的话（作者认为他的想法会是这样）抄录在下：
“我看见巴萨、克莱、德伐日、复仇女神、陪审员、法官，一长串新的压迫者从被这个惩罚工具所摧毁的老压迫者们身上升起，又在这个惩罚工具还没有停止使用前被消灭。我看见一座美丽的城市和一个灿烂的民族从这个深渊中升起。在他们争取真正的自由的奋斗中，在他们的胜利与失败之中，在未来的漫长岁月中，我看见这一时代的邪恶和前一时代的邪恶（后者是前者的自然结果）逐渐赎去自己的罪孽，并逐渐消失。
“我看见我为之献出生命的人在英格兰过着*静、有贡献、兴旺、幸福的生活——我是再也见不到英格兰了。我见到露西胸前抱着个以我命名的孩子。我看见露西的父亲衰老了、背陀了，其它方面却复了原，并以他的医术踏实地济世救人，过着*静的生活。我看见他们的好友，那个善良的老人，在十年之后把他的财产赠送给了他们，并*静地逝世，去接受主的报偿。
“我看见我在他们和他们无数代后裔心里占有神圣的地位。我看见露西成了个龙钟老妇，在我的祭日为我哭泣。我看见她跟她的丈夫正结束生命的历程，并排躺在弥留的榻上。我知道他俩彼此在对方的灵魂中占有光荣崇高的地位，而我在他俩灵魂中的地位则更光荣、更崇高。
“我看见躺在她怀里的以我命名的孩子长大**，在我曾走过的道路上奋勇前行。我看见他业绩优异，以他的光耀使我的名字辉煌。我看见我染在那名字上的污迹消失。我看见他站在公*正直的法官和光明磊落的人们的最前列。我看见他带了一个又以我命名的孩子来到这里。那时这里已是一片美景，全没了今天的扭曲和丑恶。那孩子长了个我所熟悉的前额和一头鑫发。我听见他告诉我孩子我的故事，声音颤抖，带着深情。
“我现在已做的远比我所做过的一切都美好；我将获得的休息远比我所知道的一切都甜蜜。”
“复活在我，生命也在我，信仰我的人虽然死了，也必复活；凡活着信仰我的人，必永远不死。”（《圣经新约约翰福音》第十一章第二十五节。这是耶稣因乞丐拉撒路之死说的。其后耶稣来到拉撒路墓前，死去已四天的虔信耶稣的拉撒路果然复活，体现了“凡活着信仰我的人，必永远不死”的意思。这句话是卡尔顿父亲墓碑上的铭文。）
——《双城记》1200字读后感（精选5篇）
西德尼·卡顿，在《双城记》里，一开始是一个不起眼的配角。他酗酒、虚度年华、自暴自弃，尽管长得有点呆滞，至少我是这样认为。他是一个胡狼，也就是跟在老虎身后、但不敢越犯老虎的一种动物。他总是跟在法庭红人的身后，他自己也是一名律师。一次在法庭上，他看见了一位证人小姐，并爱上了她，她叫马奈特，是医生亚历山大·马奈特女儿。马奈特已经要与一个叫查尔斯的人结婚了，这时卡顿去了马奈特家含蓄的告白，被她委婉的拒绝了。卡顿有自知之明，明白自己不会赢的这份爱情的，以后便没有纠缠马奈特，也是正常的与她接触。顺便。介绍一下查尔斯这个人。查尔斯·达内，原名查尔斯·埃弗瑞蒙德，被称为“逃亡贵族”，是法国一个贵族的后裔，但他不贪图钱财，被凶狠的叔叔夺去了他应有的一部分财产。然后，他来到了英国，认识了马奈特，以老师为职业。一年，她因为公事必须返回法国，被逮捕，判了死刑。这是，卡顿出现在法国。查尔斯被执法前一天，他以“探监”就出了查尔斯，他来到监狱，要和查尔斯换衣服，代替查尔斯在监狱里，接受死刑，查尔斯不愿意，卡顿就把他打昏，自行处理了服装，托人把查尔斯运了出去。第二天，卡顿上了断头台，走向了人生的终点。而查尔斯和跟他来的马奈特乘坐马车，逃出了法国。在卡顿临上断头台时，他说：“耶稣说，复活在我，生命也在我。信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活。凡是信我的人，必永不死。”卡顿留下的最后一句话，竟是这样的凄凉。
卡顿在向马奈特表白时，说过自己能为了他们两人的幸福而去死，他履行了自己的诺言，用一颗跳跃的心脏去救活一颗即将停止跳跃的心脏。救不救人是他自己的决定，这个结局是出乎人意料的，没想到这么微不足道的小角色会做出“惊天动地”的事。我想，等到查尔斯苏醒过来时，也一定会感激卡顿的，一定会跪在十字架前为天上的卡顿祈祷祝福吧。卡顿，我刚开始时是不喜欢他的，可是到了结尾，我却被他那伟大的行动感到震惊。他用自己的证明许下了这个诺言，用自己的生命去履行这个诺言。想到这，我的眼眶里噙满了泪水，卡顿震撼着我。现在的我们，说反悔就反悔，毫不注意自己的人格，不守信诺，虽然我们没有用生命去许下诺言，但我们依然要学*卡顿那样履行诺言，不，更准确的说是懂得奉献自己！
狄更斯也深深地为自己笔下的卡顿震撼了，他说过他会很乐意在舞台上表演卡顿这个人物。是啊，生活中正缺少像卡顿这样的人。奉献，也许奉献的是生命、时间、各种物质或是精神物质，然我们懂得奉献吧！
那是最美好的时代，那是最糟糕的时代；那是个睿智的年月，那是个蒙昧的年月；那是信心百倍的时期，那是疑虑重重的时期；那是阳光普照的季节，那是黑暗笼罩的季节；那是充满希望的春天，那是令人绝望的冬天；我们面前无所不有，我们面前一无所有；我们大家都在直升天堂，我们大家都在直下地狱。
早在创作小说《双城记》之前很久，狄更斯就对法国大革命极为关注，反复研读英国历史学家卡莱尔的《法国革命史》和其他学者的有关著作。他对法国大革命的浓厚兴趣发端于对当时英国潜伏着的严重的社会危机的担忧。1854年底，他说：“我坚信，不满情绪像这样冒烟比火烧起来还要坏得多，这个性像法国在第一次革命爆发前的公众心理，这就有危险，由于千百种原因——如收成不好、贵族阶级的专横与无能把已经紧张的局面最后一次加紧、海外战争的失利、国内偶发事件等等——变成那次从未见过的一场可怕的大火。”可见，小说《双城记》这部历史小说的创作动机在于借古讽今，以法国大革命的历史经验为借鉴，给英国统治阶级敲响警钟;同时，透过对革命恐怖的极端描述，也对心怀愤懑、希图以暴力对抗**的人民群众提出警告，幻想为社会矛盾日益加深的英国现状寻找一条出路。
从这个目的出发，小说深刻地揭露了法国大革命前深深激化了的社会矛盾，强烈地抨击贵族阶级的荒淫残暴，并深切地同情下层人民的苦难。作品尖锐地指出，人民群众的忍耐是有限度的，在贵族阶级的残暴统治下，人民群众迫于生计，必然奋起反抗。这种反抗是正义的。小说还描绘了起义人民攻击巴士底狱等壮观场景，表现了人民群众的伟大力量。然而，作者站在资产阶级人道主义的立场上，即反对残酷压迫人民的**，也反对革命人民反抗**的暴力。在狄更斯笔下，整个革命被描述成一场毁灭一切的巨大灾难，它无情地惩罚罪恶的贵族阶级，也盲目地杀害无辜的人们。
这部小说塑造了三类人物。一类是以厄弗里蒙地侯爵兄弟为代表的封建贵族，他们“唯一不可动摇的哲学就是压迫人”，是作者痛加鞭挞的对象。另一类是得伐石夫妇等革命群众。务必指出的是，他们的形象是被扭曲的。例如得伐石的妻子狄安娜，她出生于被侮辱、被迫害的农家，对封建贵族怀着深仇大恨，作者深切地同情她的悲惨遭遇，革命爆发前后很赞赏她坚强的性格、卓越的才智和非凡的组织领导潜质;但当革命进一步深入时，就笔锋一转，把她贬斥为一个冷酷、凶狠、狭隘的复仇者。尤其是当她到医生住所搜捕路茜和小路茜时，更被表现为嗜血成性的狂人。最后，作者让她死在自己的枪口之下，明确地表示了否定的态度。工地质量标语
第三类是理想化人物，是作者心目中以人道主义解决社会矛盾、以博爱战胜仇恨的榜样，包括梅尼特父女、代尔纳、劳雷和卡尔登等。梅尼特医生被侯爵兄弟害得家破人亡，对侯爵兄弟怀有深仇大恨，但是为了女儿的爱，能够摒弃宿仇旧恨;代尔纳是侯爵兄弟的子侄，他大彻大悟，谴责自己家族的罪恶，抛弃爵位和财产，决心以自己的行动来“赎罪”。这对互相辉映的人物，一个是贵族**的受害者，宽容为怀;一个是贵族侯爵的继承人，主张仁爱。他们中间，更有作为女儿和妻子的路茜。在爱的纽带的维系下，他们组成一个互相谅解、感情融洽的幸福家庭。这显然是作者设想的一条与暴力革命截然相反的解决社会矛盾的出路，是不切实际的。
小说《双城记》有其不一样于一般历史小说的地方，它的人物和主要情节都是虚构的。在法国大革命广阔的真实背景下，作者以虚构人物梅尼特医生的经历为主线索，把冤狱、感情与复仇三个互相独立而又互相关联的故事交织在一齐，情节错综，头绪纷繁。作者采取倒叙、插叙、伏笔、铺垫等手法，使小说结构完整严密，情节曲折紧张而富有戏剧性，表现了卓越的艺术技巧。小说《双城记》风格肃穆、沉郁，充满忧愤，但缺少早期作品的幽默。
端午假期说长不长，说短又不短，三天时间，远程旅行没办法，短途旅行又不甘心，思来想去，只有待在家里多陪家人。趁此时间，读了两本书，《双城记》与《断舍离》。
断舍离现在已经算是网红词了，放下执念，放下欲望，人才会活得轻松。不过我的感悟最多的倒不是放下，而是另外两点：
1、人生得意时，要多往上看，这样自己才会更有动力；人生失意时，要多往下看，这样自己才会知足常乐；
2、人生向上时，要告诉自己，人活一世，不能浑浑噩噩过；人生向下时，要劝自己，人生苦短，要看开，不要太累。
更多的感想是看双城记后引发的。双城记是狄更斯的作品，与雾都孤儿一样都是世界名著，不过读完之后感觉就算同为世界名著，也分为上中下等，双城记应该是其中相对低层次的。
双城记的故事设置相对巧妙，也用了一些技法，通过一个很强的悬念引出故事，“死人复活了”，不可谓不巧妙，再加上那个经典名段，“这是最好的时代，又是最坏的时代”，足以吸引读者进行下去，接下来又通过两个不同家庭各自的故事线往前延伸，你虽然不知道他们之间有什么关系，但是你肯定知道他们之间一定会有什么关系。等到故事收尾的时候，你才发现，哇，前面的各种线索，各种不解，都是很好的铺垫，故事的转折还算巧妙，看完是可以回味回味的。
而且这类名著与小白文的最大的区别，除了情节的细节一环扣一环，前后呼应的伏笔，人物对话的丰富性等，最大的不同在于，双城记是通过小人物的人生遭遇，给读者展现了法国大革命的全貌，阶级的冲突，人物命运的前后颠倒，对下等阶层人物的同情，却又保证客观性，并不一味站在哪一边，等到革命成功之后，起义群众对于生命的蔑视，对于正义的罔顾，对于对错的愚昧，也成了作者讽刺的对象，最终的结果必然是悲剧，因为只有悲剧的内核才足够引起反思与警醒。
这跟金庸的不少小说有异曲同工之妙，将故事嵌入进时代的大背景中，浑然天成，并不会感觉是故事，这非得对于历史与世情的理解到十分，才可以实现。不同的是金庸写的是通俗小说，其中取悦读者的部分，比如主角的爱情，各种武侠招式的奇妙，最终大团圆大结局的设计，对整个故事的立意与内涵是有一些遗憾的。
但是双城记也并不是没有遗憾，其中主角露西与达奈二人的形象过于脸谱化，一对优秀的青年男女，简直是没有缺点的存在，德法耶太太的邪恶部分完全盖过了她的坚定，机智等特质，对她的悲惨命运也没有多加阐述，整个弱化了故事的矛盾与冲突感，不得不说是一种遗憾。而且各种人物配角的血肉不够丰满立体，特别是主角西德尼的描述上，如果能够多花费一些篇幅，多描写他的经历与人生，引起读者的认同与代入感，那最终的结局带来的震撼与惋惜一定会更强烈。
《双城记》是英国作家狄更斯的一部以法国大革命为背景的历史小说。其中“双城”分别是指英国伦敦和法国巴黎，以梅尼特一家充满爱与冒险的故事为主要情节，这其中有贵族的残暴、人民的愤怒，当然还有更多。下面
作家确实绕不过他所存在的那个时代，无论他多么富有想象力和预测能力。狄更斯，这个生活于19世界的伟大作家无论如何在写作的过程中逃不过他对于历史宏大叙事的极度观照。
是啊，一个作家在自己不熟悉的领域怎么可能写出一部伟大的作品呢？带着强烈的历史痕迹，忠实于自己对于时代的感觉和思考——这也许是他之所以伟大的特征之一吧。
*来，好不容易看完了《双城记》。说来惭愧，中学时候的英语教材里有它的相关节选，而对于整部作品的一知半解和断章取义竟然被我当成了一种想像通读之后的思想资源。
当冷静下来，重新回归这一伟大文本的时候，我才豁然发现自己的浅薄与矜夸。当然，似乎这不是我第一次重新回归文本，沉浸当中享受文本之美，也不是我第一次由一部部作品而突然间发现自己的浅薄与矜夸，所以面对前人及其作品，我诚惶诚恐，无比敬畏。
《双城记》究竟是一部怎样的作品？我想答文学史当中已经有了公断，说他是现实主义的巨著。然而，当我们的文学史当研究从阶级论的“余毒”当中“幡然醒悟”之后才承认爱情在整部作品里面的分量——这或许是一种反拨，在强烈的阶级断之后，有些研究者又将之作为一个爱情文本来进行解读——这不难理解，文本当中露西与达奈的爱情，卡顿对露西的爱，这些都可以说是爱情。尤其是卡顿主动代替达奈赴死时的表白，更是感人至深。“爱的无私奉献。”有研究者这样概括。
我想这种爱并非仅仅爱情。还有亲情，露西从法国千里迢迢将马内特医生带回伦敦，然后帮他恢复心理和身体健康；马内特医生帮助女儿，并在第一次时将达奈从狱中救出；洛里先生对于马内特一家的友谊……这些都超越了爱情的范畴，综合之不难直接升华到一个纯粹的“爱”字上。
爱，人类的永恒之爱，它包括爱情之爱、亲情之爱、友谊之爱、长幼互敬之爱，等等。
但作为一个对社会有着强烈的体验和感知能力的人，一个对于社会发展有着强烈的思考和分析能力的人，狄更斯不会仅仅热衷于描写一个家庭内部的爱，更何况在19世纪那个风云变幻、激荡而富有生机的时代。
狄更斯究竟在思考什么？阅读《双城记》的时候我一直在思考这个问题。
在小说的结尾，狄更斯提到文本当中的历史背景——法国大革命时期，并且提到了吉伦特派代表人物之一罗兰夫人被压上断头台后，在生命的最后时刻发出振聋发聩的呐喊：“自由，多少罪恶假汝之名以行。”
我相信每一个看过《双城记》的人，都会在震撼之余赞不绝口。由英国著名作家狄更斯所著的这部书，永垂不朽！名著就是名著，不管多少年过后，名著依然散发着璀璨光彩，更何况这部书故事不可想象的跌宕起伏，情节离奇而曲折，大师就是大师，在让你明知道故事是虚构的，却依然为故事里的人和事，或感动，或愤怒，或忧伤，或流泪，不由你不佩服大师的虚构能力。
狄更斯在《双城记》里揭露了法国大革命爆发前，贵族阶级对人民无情压迫，视广大穷苦人为贱狗，民不聊生，终于爆发了法国大革命，贫困人民在长期惨无人道的压迫后，疯狂的报复贵族阶级，同样无情的审判当权者和判决他们的性命，血债就要血偿，仇恨蒙蔽了眼镜，鲜血兴奋了神经，一个个人头落地，但报复能解决问题吗？能让人过上幸福安乐的日子吗？这是狄更斯在书中提出的疑虑。如果当权者对人民多一点慈悲，多一点爱，让每一个人都不受欺压，恐怕大革命也不会爆发，要知道劳动人民对社会的要求很低很低啊！大革命应该是对当权者的警告。值得幸运的是，在二十世纪我们这个年代，我们的当权者，不论是中国的***，还是美国的，他们都提出了让所有人共同富裕，让大家一起享受社会经济发展的成果，他们认为偏袒富人的社会不只是不道义的，还会严重威胁到社会的稳定。
爱、宽容是作者美好的设想，因目睹了一对贵族兄弟残害贫苦人家的罪行，被陷害关在了巴士底狱18年的医生，在狱中医生愤怒了，他偷偷记录了自己受迫害的经过，发誓要向天堂和人间控告，控告贵族和他们的子子孙孙，直至最后一个，在长年的关押中，医生失去了理智，做鞋子成了维持生命的唯一寄托。出狱后，因为有了女儿对父亲深深的爱，父亲恢复了理智，用伟大的爱和宽容同意了陷害他的贵族的后代于自己女儿的婚事。
当以一幅一直仰视法庭天花板形象出现的卡尔顿先生，给人的印象是多么的不羁和傲慢，虽然他才华横溢，虽然他拥有一颗无比珍贵的心，但是因为社会的暗无天日，他选择了放荡，选择了玩世不恭，选择了醉生梦死，卡尔顿对露西的爱是多么纯洁和无私啊，他在露西幸福的时候选择了默默祝福，暗暗守护在她身边，当露西需要救助时，他竟然选择了以自己的生命换取露西丈夫的生命，以保证露西的幸福，虽然我不相信世上真会有这样的感情，但我还是深深的同情、怜惜卡尔顿，无比尊敬他的感情，希望天下所有的温柔都归属于他，来慰籍他受伤的心灵。
被贵族迫害的儿女们，仇恨胀满了胸怀，报复变成了刀斧，象征复仇女神的德法热太太的死不正是隐喻了报复的代价吗？
仇恨、宽容、爱啊！这一切让我们深深的思索反省！卡尔顿的一番话应该是对这一切最好的注脚：这个时代的罪恶，以及自然生出这罪恶的以前时代的罪恶渐渐自行补偿并消失，一个美丽和*充满爱的时代终将诞生！
看完故事后，你脑中还会有叮叮当当的做鞋声在回响吗？还在为医生的黯然迷惘，悲哀无助而落泪而愤怒吗？还在为卡尔顿留下怜惜的泪吗？还在为德法热太太而叹息吗？我想你一定是在为医生一家终于幸福*安而默默祝福吧！
